Killing Unborn Babies Ethic
If Bush is so adamant in his belief that killing unborn babies in the womb is against God’s will, why is it OK with him that he is responsible for the following:
1. Killing the unborn, as well as the born, children by the thousands as long as they are associated with the enemy and qualify as “collateral damage?”
2. Killing the “children” of any age by the hundreds of thousands as long as they also qualify as “collateral damage?”
3. Killing as many as possible of “the enemy” by the untold thousands as possible, regardless of the fact that his will is surely superceded by the will of his God?
4. Subjecting thousands of his own citizen soldiers to death and/or horrific physical and psychological injury to satisfy hia personal view of what the citizens of this country really want and his standing in his own mind as our Leader and Decider.
Surely he and his evangelical supporters profane the House of God each and every time they enter therein.
3 weeks ago
3 comments:
Little bill
He is such a lying two faced scum. There is no rhyme or reason to that idiot. He is only trying to please his perverted Religious base.
I was pretty bugged listening to his sorry excuse for vetoing the kids healthcare while looking for another 200 billion for his forever wars.
Seeing him explain his veto of the S-CHIP bill was a case study in how no matter when you think a person can not go any lower they somehow find a way to surprise you.
Lil'Bill, tell me one thing Bush has touched that he hasn't profaned? Some even call him the Whore President.